|
Sierra
Club Relationship with Coca-Cola, Inc.

BevNet, Apr. 6, 2009
Honest
Tea, the nation's top-selling organic
bottled tea company, is partnering
with Sierra Club, the nation's oldest
and largest grassroots environmental
non-profit, to raise consumer awareness
about the environment through a
year-long retail program and consumer
online
giveaway.
"Right now, many Americans are
trying to live in a socially and environmentally
conscious manner," said Carl
Pope, Sierra Club's Executive Director. "We
are proud to support Honest Tea's
mission to provide Americans with
organic and healthier beverages."
Beginning today, consumers can find
the Sierra Club logo on bottles of
Honest Tea's organic, antioxidant-rich
green tea varieties: Moroccan Mint,
Green Dragon, Honey Green and Mango
Green Tea. Honest Tea will donate
a portion of the proceeds from the
sale of each specially marked bottle
to support Sierra Club's conservation
efforts and the protection of America''s
clean air, water, parks and wildlife.
In addition to highlighting the new
relationship on bottles, Honest Tea
will also be incorporating Sierra
Club into sales and field marketing
efforts by creating special displays
in retailers and distributing materials
at sampling events across the country.
"Eliminating the need for synthetic
chemicals is one way to protect our
eco-system and supporting Sierra Club
is another," said Seth Goldman,
President and TeaEO of Honest Tea. "We're
delighted to be partnering with
Sierra Club to offer consumers a
new kind
of green tea."
To celebrate the partnership, Honest
Tea and Sierra Club Outings are
hosting an online consumer giveaway
to encourage
people to explore, enjoy and protect
the planet. By visiting http://www.honesttea.com/sierraclub,
consumers can enter to win one
of four outdoor adventures for
two from
Sierra Club Outings with round
trip airfare and a year's supply
of Honest
Tea or Honest Ade courtesy of
Honest Tea. Trips are available
for all ages,
abilities and interests - from
whitewater rafting in Colorado
to backpacking
through Tahoe National Forest.
The full list of trips is available
at
http://www.sierraclub.org/outings.
A new kind of "green" tea:
Honest Tea & Sierra Club partner
to support sustainabili-tea,
4/6/2009, http://www.bevnet.com/news/2009/4-6-2009-honsest_tea_sierra_club_sustainability
Washington Post, Feb. 5, 2008
Honest Tea, the Bethesda organic beverage
firm launched 10 years ago in its co-founder's
kitchen with five borrowed thermoses,
sold a 40 percent stake to Coca-Cola
in a move designed to extend its not-too-sweet
drinks to more mainstream palates.
Coke's investment of $43 million values
the company at more than $100 million,
according to a person familiar with the
transaction who spoke on the condition
of anonymity because the terms were not
publicly disclosed.
The agreement gives Coke, which last
year bought the maker of Vitamin Water
for $4.1 billion, a relatively inexpensive
way to continue diversifying its beverage
offerings as healthy, non-carbonated
drinks surge in popularity. For Honest
Tea, which has yet to turn a profit,
Coke provides access to a deep distribution
network and a potential way into national
food chains such as McDonald's and Subway.
Seth Goldman, the borrower of the thermoses
who founded the company with a professor
from his days at Yale's business school,
will continue to run Honest Tea for the
next three years, after which Coke has
an option to buy the company outright.
Honest Tea insiders will also continue
to control the board of directors. The
arrangement is intended to protect Honest
Tea from floundering the way other small
beverage companies such as Snapple or
Mad River did after big corporations
entered the picture.
Apparently Coke considers Goldman's
do-good vision central enough to Honest
Tea that it required the company to purchase
a large life insurance policy for him.
The arrangement leaving Honest Tea executives
in control provides Goldman with additional
peace of mind.
"Seth has done a very good job
running this business, but it's still
very small and it needs to ramp up quickly
to stay competitive," said John
Sicher, editor of Beverage Digest.
But the combination of Honest Tea, so
eco-conscious that it buys bicycles for
its employees, and Coke, one of the country's
largest corporations, raises inevitable
questions about whether Goldman and his
team are selling out. Honest Tea's bottled
iced tea has surged in popularity because
the product is what its mainstream competition
is not: healthy, less sugary, made from
tea grown in a sustainable garden in
India.
Goldman said he expects tough questions,
but he has answers -- namely that this
deal helps Honest Tea sell more of its
fair-trade products, thus expanding the
company's reach, not damaging it. It's
still Honest Tea, he said. He is so zealous
about the company's mission and ability
to sell a great product that he travels
to business meetings, including the negotiations
with Coke, with a cooler of iced tea.
"It's easy for someone to think
that you are selling out both literally
and figuratively, but what we are trying
to communicate is that they are buying
in," Goldman said.
In a blog entry yesterday titled "The
Next Stage of Growth -- An Honest Deal," Goldman
said that despite growing 70 percent
last year, the company still wasn't
reaching as many customers as possible
and that
Honest Tea had the potential to be
an even more powerful corporate citizen.
"When we buy 2.5 million pounds
of organic ingredients, as we did in
2007, we help create demand for a more
sustainable system of agriculture, one
that doesn't rely on chemical pesticides
and fertilizers," Goldman wrote. "But
when we buy ten times that amount,
we help create a market that multiplies
far beyond our own purchases."
The idea: Socially conscious independents
can do more good for the world with
the help of big corporations than they
can
in fighting them. "If we are able
to sell 10 times more product, we are
doing 10 times more in terms of bringing
a great healthy product to consumers," said
Barry Nalebuff, Goldman's former business
professor at Yale and the company's
chairman.
The question for Honest Tea is whether
customers will buy this rationale. Sicher,
the Beverage Digest editor, said it helps
their argument that Goldman and Nalebuff
are still in control, but he added that
when the tea hits the lips, what matters
most to consumers is not who owns what.
"It is my belief having studied
this for a long time that most consumers
are not that interested in parent company
ownership," Sicher said. "They
are interested in what the product
delivers for them. Seth has built this
brand by
offering good taste in an organic product.
Now he should be able to do that better
and faster."
For starters, Coke is McDonald's beverage
supplier, meaning that Honest Tea has
an easier route to a deal to serve its
drinks in the world's largest fast-food
chain, which has been adding more-healthful
products. Honest Tea executives think
their organic, low-sugar juice pouches
for children could do particularly well
at McDonald's.
Another way Coke can help Honest Tea,
Goldman said, is by giving it a stronger
foothold in markets where the company
has a limited presence but potential
for larger demand. One such area, he
said, was Northern California, which
has a relatively affluent population
interested in healthy living. But Honest
Tea, with a hodgepodge of distributors,
hasn't been able to gain enough traction.
Coke's network will be a boost.
"We know we can do a lot more out
there," Goldman said. "You
can have a brand, but if you don't
have a presence in chains, it's hard
to promote."
Despite what Coke may be able to provide,
Goldman knows the deal is not risk-free. "The
world of mission-driven business is littered
with entrepreneurs whose companies lost
their soul or at least lost their leadership," Goldman
wrote in his blog. Snapple lost its
way after being purchased by Quaker
Oats.
In 2001, Coke bought Mad River, another
natural tea company, but not long after
the company took over the brand, Mad
River was retired.
"It has to be nurtured and built
the right way," Goldman said.
A Stronger Brew?
Honest Tea Says Coke Buy-In Will Extend Its Reach,
Michael S. Rosenwald,
Wed., Feb. 6, 2008; Page D01, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/02/05/
ST2008020503613.html
Chewswise, Feb. 5, 2008
Honest Tea announced today that it
sold a 40-percent stake to Coca-Cola
Co. I've written in the past about
this great company, which for 10
years has been plugging away making
a tasty, all organic, less sweet
bottled tea product and growing like
crazy. But when the email announcing
the deal landed in my in-box, I had
to do a double-take.
A double-take, even though I've seen
nearly every major success story in
the organic world gobbled up by a mainstream
player. Even though, this deal makes
so much sense I want to slap myself
silly. Even though, Honest Tea was
immediately de-cokifying itself on
the founder's blog:
While Coke is now our largest shareholder,
the agreement was negotiated to ensure
that Honest Tea will not be managed
or controlled by Coke. We will continue
to operate as an independent business
with the same leadership and mission.
(my emphasis).
Seth Goldman, who co-founded this
company by lugging around bottles of
tea in duffel bags, has seen it all.
But when I talked with him, a couple
of years back, he kept making the point
of how hard it was to get on store
shelves.
In the $50 billion bottled drink biz,
making the flavored water (tea, juice,
soda, vitamin water, whatever) is the
easy part. The much harder part is
getting others to sell it. We're talking
distribution, shelf placement, getting
eyeballs in front of the drink, so
that consumers can give it a chance.
Because once they try it, they'll probably
come back. But getting to the starting
gate is really, really hard.
Seth had to claw each step of the
way. A deal with beer distributors
in Chicago was a major coup. Finally
getting into corner bodegas in San
Francisco was a score. When he made
Target, that was like being on deck
in the World Series. All the time,
he kept looking over his shoulder,
hoping that he was keeping his core
customers, like Whole Foods, happy,
even as he expanded beyond their universe.
After all, he had to, in order to grow.
And, after nearly a decade expanding,
he told me he was finally, finally
breaking even. Not making money. But
not losing any. Yeah!
To get to this point, he brought venture
investors onto the team, and they tend
to look for a return on investment.
Put those two elements together --
the crying need for a distribution
channel and an investor pay day --
and the company's fate was sealed.
A sale of equity was all but inevitable.
As Seth and his co-founder, Barry Nalebuff,
a Yale biz professor (both pictured
above), state on their blog:
Despite our 66% annual compound growth
rate (70% in 2007), we still aren’t
reaching all the people we want to
reach. Our business has inspired many
... but we also want to see Honest
be a change agent through our own actions.
When we buy 2.5 million pounds of organic
ingredients, as we did in 2007, we
help create demand for a more sustainable
system of agriculture, one that doesn’t
rely on chemical pesticides and fertilizers.
But when we buy ten times that amount,
we help create a market that multiplies
far beyond our own purchases. When
we sell 32 million bottles and drink
pouches with less than half the calories
of mainstream alternatives, as we did
in 2007, we help displace 2,400,000,000
empty calories. That’s important,
but when we sell ten times that number,
we help lead a national shift toward
healthier diets.
But hold on there Seth ... I get the
bigger is greener and more healthy
part. But remember, you're getting
into bed with the people who put high
fructose corn syrup on the map. You're
selling equity to the same people you
want to displace. Is there something
wrong with this picture?
The risks here are obvious, ending
up as so much Snapple road kill, or
worse, as you recognize:
So how do we move from the ideal
to the real without screwing up what
we’ve created? The world of mission-driven
business is littered with entrepreneurs
whose companies lost their soul or
at least lost their leadership. Whether
you talk to Ben Cohen from Ben & Jerry’s
or Steve Demos from Silk, they will
tell you that if they could do it over
again, they would have done it differently.
I am determined to make sure that never
happens with Honest Tea. Our challenge
is to find a partner who wants to “buy
in” to our mission, rather than
one who wants us to “sell out”.
Any partner that we consider must understand
that the “Honest” brand
stands for great-tasting, healthier
beverages that are produced in a more
sustainable manner. As long as that
partner buys into our approach, we
welcome the opportunity to expand the
scale and reach of Honest Tea.
Funny, Seth, but when I talked with
Steve Demos after he sold Silk he used
the same language. Dean Foods was "buying
in," he wasn't "selling out." But
that's before he was kicked out the
door.
But, I know, I know. With ubber social
capitalist Gary Hirshberg of Stonyfield
on your board, you believe that this
can be done. Hirshberg's argued for
years he's doing it with Danone. And
Coke will support your mission because
your mission will make them money.
Plus, you cannot remain small and independent
in the drink market and survive. No
one has. Can't be done.
And I know why Coke is buying you.
The soda business is not just stagnant,
it's shrinking. The market for bottled
water and less-sweet, low-caloric drinks
is going through the roof. Coke and
the others need a new game in town.
You're it.
But remember your name, Honest Tea?
The name implies that there is something
less honest or dishonest out there
that is being sold, and you are the
alternative. Being the alternative
- it's part of your DNA.
So you have to make the case that
Coke will not compromise all that your
brand stands for, and has stood for,
over the years. Heck, all that YOU
stand for.
And that, frankly, is going to be
the toughest sale of your career. Because
it has less to do with selling Honest
Tea than it does with selling Coke.
Seth, Why'd You Sell Honest
Tea to Freakin' Coke? Samuel
Fromartz, February 5, 2008, http://www.chewswise.com/chews/2008/02/seth-whyd-you-s.html
Sierra
Club Bottled Water Brochure
"The bottled water industry, led by
Nestlé,
Coca
Cola, and Pepsi Cola, is aggressively
promoting
bottled water. In the U.S., more than
30 billion
plastic water bottles end up as garbage
or litter
each year. Most don’t get recycled.
The bottles
take up to 1,000 years to decompose
and contribute to the vast vortex of
plastic
waste in
the Pacific Ocean, which is harming
wildlife.
"The withdrawal of large quantities
of water from
springs and aquifers for bottling
has depleted
household wells in rural areas, damaged
wetlands,
and degraded lakes. It takes 3 liters
of
water to produce 1 liter of bottled
water."
Bottled Water:
Learning the Facts and Taking Action, http://www.sierraclub.org/committees/cac/water/
bottled_water/bottled_water.pdf
Sierra Club Website
"Right now I'm working on
Coca-Cola and its water practices
in India. In two places, Mehdiganj
and Plachimada, villagers accuse
Coke of pumping groundwater— dangerously
lowering the water table — and
then selling it back to the
villagers in bottles as Coke,
Fanta, and
water. I consider this a U.S.
issue because I live near Atlanta
and
that's where Coca-Cola is headquartered.
To have an effect you have
to change people's minds where
you
live,
help them see what's going
on."
One Small Step: Teaching
Coke to Live in Perfect Harmony,
http://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/
200505/step.asp
"Sierra Club signs international
letter to the Secretary General of
the United
Nations opposing formation of "CEO
Water Mandate" as prime example
of green washing by corporations which
stand to benefit from water privatization."
Sierra Club Opposes Corporate
Water Mandate, http://www.sierraclub.org/committees/cac/water/
March 20, 2008
Mr. Ban Ki-Moon
Secretary General,
United Nations Headquarters
S-3800
New York, NY 10017
USA
Dear Mr. Secretary General,
We, the undersigned civil
society organizations, are deeply involved
in struggles
for water
justice
taking place around the world. We appreciate
the public warnings you have made recently
about the
growing crisis of global water shortages
and how they are fueling, along with
climate change, many of
the conflicts going on around the world
today. However, we do not share your
enthusiastic support for
the CEO Water Mandate, nor do we believe
that a voluntary corporate-driven initiative
is a viable
solution to the mounting worldwide
water crisis.
Under the United Nations’ Global
Compact, the CEO Water Mandate is presented
as a prime example
of environmental stewardship. However,
we are concerned that the real agenda of
the CEO Water
Mandate is to facilitate greater control
over water sources and services by for-profit
corporations. In
our view, this is a prime example of ‘green-washing’ on
the part of major companies and the
United Nations should not be involved
in legitimizing
this process.
Furthermore, voluntary initiatives
like those used by the UN Global Compact
in
its collaboration with
corporations have been shown to be
flawed. Not only are the principles
narrowly
conceived, but the
companies typically fail to put them
into practice and they are also allowed
to ‘opt
in’ or ‘opt out’ of
the standards set.
Led by Coca Cola, which has a
highly questionable track record when
it comes to water takings
and
water pollution, the companies which
have signed on to the CEO Water Mandate
all
have a vested
interest in securing control over water
sources and services in times of increasing
water scarcity. Suez
is the world’s largest privatizer
of water services and Nestle is the world’s
leading bottled water
company. Pepsico and Groupe DANONE
are also major players in the global
bottled
water industry.
Other signers include food giants like
Unilever, clothing manufacturers like
Levi-Strauss, and chemical
companies like Dow Chemical, all of
whom are greatly dependent on water
sources
for the production
of their products.
To make matters worse, we understand
that these same corporations and their
allies
met on March 5th
behind closed doors at the United Nations
in New York to map out their plan of
action for the CEO
Water Mandate. Given the failure to safeguard
against conflicts of interest and the
lack of transparency
of the process, we have no other recourse
but to reject your appeal that civil
society organizations join
the CEO Water Mandate.
We maintain that water is the essence
of life on this planet. As such, it is
both a human right and an
ecological trust. Local communities must
be recognized as the true guardians of
their local watersheds.
Democratically elected governments must
be responsible for ensuring community participation
and
control over water sources and services.
The United Nations should be looking to
local communities
and representative governments, rather
than for-profit corporations, to set the
global policy agenda and
lead the development of solutions to the
world water crisis.
For these reasons, we urge you,
Mr. General Secretary, to withdraw your
support for
the CEO Water
Mandate because of its inherent conflicts
of interest and lack of transparency.
Alternatively, we would be prepared to
work with you in developing more transparent,
accountable
global institutions and mechanisms to ensure
access to water for people and the environment.
For follow-up, please contact Tony Clarke,
Polaris Institute, tclarke@polarisinstitute.org
and Kathryn
Mulvey, Corporate Accountability International,
kmulvey@stopcorporateabuse.org.
Sincerely,
Issah Ali, Action for Integrated Development
(AID), Ghana
Koos van Schie, Africa - Europe Faith & Justice
Network, Belgium and Divine Word
Missionaries, Belgium
Claude Drui, Africa-Europe Foi et Justice
Network, Pôle de Strasbourg,
France
Prasanna Saligram, AID Bangalore / People's
Health Movement, India
Ruth Caplan, Alliance For Democracy, USA
Renji George, Joseph Alliance for Holistic
and Sustainable Development of Communities,
India
Tara Lohan, Alternet, USA
Rabin Subedi, Arun 3 Concerned Group, Nepal
Maria Lucely Alzate, Asociación
de Desarrollo Comunitario en El Quindío –ADECOQUIN,
Colombia
Claudia Saller, Austrian Network Social
Responsibility (Netzwerk Soziale
Verantwortung), Austria
Zakir Kibria, Banglapraxis, Bangladesh
Krishan Bir Chaudhary, Bharatiya Krishak
Samaj (Indian Farmers' Organisation),
India
Anil Naidoo, Blue Planet Project, Canada
Ron Challis, Canadian Auto Workers
Union, Local 1520
Hassan Yusseff, Canadian Labour Congress,
Canada
Markus Schlagnitweit, Catholic Social
Academy of Austria
Matthias Reichl, Center for Encounter
and Active Non-Violence, Austria
Jackie Dugard, Centre For Applied Legal
Studies (CALS), University of The Witwatersrand,
South Africa
Patrick Bond, Centre for Civil Society
Environmental Justice Project, University
of
Kwazulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
D Roy Laifungbam, Centre for Organisation
Research & Education, Indigenous
Peoples' Centre for Policy and Human
Rights in India's
Eastern Himalayan Territories, India
Andrés Barreda Marín,
Centro de Análisis Social, Información
y Formación Popular – CASIFOP,
México
Lorena Peralta Rojas, Centro de Derechos
Humanos “Fray
Francisco De Vitoria, O.P.", A.C.,
México
Marco Von Borstel, Coalición de
Organizaciones Mexicanas por el Derecho
al Agua, México
Arun Kumar Shrestha ,Coasts, Wetlands
and Tropical Ecosystem Research (CWATER),
India
Jacqueline Lenoir, Congrégation
des Soeurs de la Providence de Ruillé-sur-Loir,
France
Hannah S. Wiegard, College of William
and Mary Student Environmental Action
Coalition,
USA
Carmen E. Sosa ,Comisión Nacional
En Defensa Del Agua Y La Vida - Red Vida
- Uruguay
Onlus E. Moliari, Comitato Italiano Per
Il Contratto Mondiale Sull'acqua
Sandra Cangemi, Comitato Milanese Per
L'acqua, Milano, Italia
Richard Priestman, Committee on Monetary
and Economic Reform, Kingston Chapter,
Canada
Shah I Mobin Jinnah, Community Development
Association, Bangladesh
Ramon Certeza, Confederation of Labor
and Allied Social Services (CLASS) – TUCP,
The Philippines
Agnès Hédon, Congrégation
Religieuses Catholiques, Notre Dame du
Cénacle,
France
Jocelyne Vander Beken, Congrégation
Salésienne de la Visitation, Belgique
Gustavo Spedale, Coordinadora Córdoba
En Defensa Del Agua Y La Vida (Ccodav),
Argentina
Hernan Porras Gallego, Corporación
de Estudios, Educación e Investigación
Ambiental CEAM,
Colombia
Julio César Maya Gualdrón,
Corporación
para la Educación Integral y el
Bienestar Ambiental - La Ceiba,
Colombia
Kathryn Mulvey, Corporate Accountability
International, USA
Olivier Hoedeman, Corporate Europe Observatory,
The Netherlands
Mike Louw, COSATU Western Cape, South
Africa
Maude Barlow, Council of Canadians
A. Ercelan, Creed Alliance Pakistan
Victoria Sant, Daughters of the Sacred
Heart, Malta Antenna
Areli Sandoval Teran, Deca Equipo Pueblo,
A.C. - Mexico
Jörg Felmeden, Departement of Sanitary
and Environmental Engineering (DESEE),
University of Kassel, Germany
Juan Camilo Mira, Ecofondo, Colombia
Tom Kucharz, Ecologistas en Acción,
Spain.
Kayleigh Boyle, Emerson Peace and Social
Justice, USA
Patricia Jones, Environmental Justice,
USA
Riccardo Petrella, European Research
Institute on Water Policy, Brussels
Luis Isarra Delgado, Federacion Nacional
de Trabajadores del Agua Potable y Alcantarillado
del Peru
Oscar Olivera, Federation of Factory
Workers from Cochabamba, Bolivia
Mary Ann Manahan, Focus On The Global
South, India, Philippines and Thailand
Wenonah Hauter, Food & Water Watch,
USA
Marie Louise Inghels, Franciscaines Missionaires
de Marie, Belgium
Ricardo Ramirez Aguirre Frente Nacional
por la Salud de los Pueblos del Ecuador
Boris
Ríos Brito, Fundación
Abril, Bolivia
Raúl Mauricio Rodríguez
G., Fundación Centro de Investigaciones
del Pacífico (Cenipacífico),
Colombia
David A Mcdonald, Global Development
Studies, Queen's University
Kirsten Moller, Global Exchange, USA
Sabine Hofmann, Globalisierungskritische
Gruppe Welzheim, Germany
Sandra Finley, Green Party of Saskatchewan,
Canada
Rao Javaid Iqbal, Helping Hand For
Relief & Development,
USA
Gopal Siwakoti 'Chintan', Himalayan
and Peninsular Hydro-Ecological Network
(HYPHEN),
Nepal
Maria Theresa Nera-Lauron, Ibon Foundation
Inc, The Philippines
Karen Lang, IDEC - Instituto Brasileiro
de Defesa do Consumidor, Brazil
Wilfred Dcosta, Indian Social Action
Forum (Insaf), Indida
Carol Bergin, Initiative Colibri, Germany
June Deborah Meek, International Brotherhood
of Teamsters, USA
Michael Sozinyu, International Socialist
Organisation, Zimbabwe
Mesbahuddin Ahmed, Jatiyo Sramik Jote,
Bangladesh
Christian Robert,i Justice-Paix-Intégrité de
la Création, Congrégation
du Saint Esprit, Belgium
Sumesh Mangalassery, KABANI – The
Other Direction, India
Erick Otieno Owuor, Kamukunji Aralegal
Network, Kenya
Ayodele Akele, Labour, Health And Human
Rights Development Centre, Lhahrdev,
Nigeria
Vita De Waal, Liaison Planetary Association
For Clean Energy, Canada
Ajay Kumar Khare, Madhya Pradesh Vigyan
Sabha/People’s Health Movement
chapter, India
Manuel Peña Celis, MASTRANTO
del Municipio de Paz de Ariporo, Departamento
de Casanare, Colombia
Terry Swier, Michigan Citizens For
Water Conservation
Zeki Ergas, Millennium Solidarity Geneva
Group, Switzerland
André Claessens, Missionaries
of the S. Heart, Borgerhout, Belgium
Angela Wiley, Morgantown High School
Green Initiative, USA
Meghan Dougherty, National Advocacy
Center of the Sisters of the Good Shepherd,
USA
Ratan Bhandari, National Concerns Society,
Nepal
Sandra Willard, New Democratic Party,
Lanark Frontenac Lennox And Addington
Riding
Association, Canada
Katherine Hoyt, Nicaragua Network
Gustavo Castro Soto, Otros Mundos,
AC, Chiapas, México
Hans G. Kratz, Parksville-Qualicum
Kairos, Canada
Pete Williams, Peace and Justice Organization
of St. Olaf College, USA
Rapudo Hawi ,Pedagogue Milestones,
Kenya
Liz Welsh, Peoples’ Health Movement,
South Africa
V. Soundara Rajan, Pesat Ngo, India
R. Ajayan, Plachimada Solidarity Committee,
India
Tony Clarke, Polaris Institute, Canada
Elsa Nivia, Rapalmira, Rap-Al, Colombia
Erika Arteaga, Red de Accion, Taller
Observatorio de Politicas de Salud,
Ecuador
María Selva Ortiz, REDES-Amigos
De La Tierra, Uruguay
Annie Girard, Réseau Foi et
Justice Afrique-Europe, Antenne de
France
Kathleen Ruff, Rightoncanada
Art Cohen, Saniplan, USA
Christine Elwell Sierra Club of Canada
Larry Williams Sierra Club, USA
Anne Rutter, Sisters of St Joseph Of
Annecy, England
Winifred Doherty, Sisters of the Good
Shepherd International Justice and Peace
Office, USA
Manu Alphonse, Social Watch - TAMILNADU",
India
Muhammad Arshad Khan, Society for Social
Justice & Development
Pasrur (Sialkot) Pakistan.
Louisa Barton-Duguay, Sos Eau Water Sankwan
Inc, Canada
Jeff Rudin, South African Municipal Workers'
Union
Lucian Borg, St. Augustine’s Priory,
La Valletta, Malta
Elaine Hughes, Stop The Hogs Coalition
Christina Copeland, Sustainability Hub
at Cornell University, USA
Gallege Punyawardana Alvis, Swarna Hansa
Foundation, Sri Lanka
Á lvaro J. de Regil, The Jus Semper Global
Alliance, USA
Joy Kennedy, The United Church Of Canada
Satoko Kishimoto, Transnational Institute
(Tni), The Netherlands
Ahmed Nawaz Khan, Umeedenao Citizen Community
Board, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
Asim Nawaz Khan, Umeed-E-Nao Citizen
Community Board, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
Rob Keithan, Unitarian Universalist Association
Of Congregations
Sachin Kumar Jain, Vikas Samvad, Bhopal,
India
Mariama Ahmeda Mansaray, Voices of the
Voiceless, Ghana
Ram Chandra Chataut, Water and Energy
Users' Federation-Nepal (WAFED)
Trude Malthe Thomassen, Water Movement
, Norway
Gaye Yilmaz, Waterpolitics, Turkey
Martha Spiess, Women's International
League for Peace and Freedom,
Maine chapter, USA
Laura Roskos, Women's International League
for Peace and Freedom, U.S. Section
Benedict Southworth, World Development
Movement, UK
Peter Fuchs, World Economy, Ecology & Development
(WEED), Berlin,Germany
Mónica Vargas, Xarxa de L'observatori
del Deute en la Globalització,
Catalonia
Muyunda Ililonga, Zambia Consumers Association,
Zambia
Adonio Mutero, Zimbabwe Labour Centre,
Zimbabwe
Ludo Vercammen, Zusters van Liefde van
Jesus en Marie, Leuven, The Netherlands
Text of Letter to Ban Ki-Moon
Signed by Sierra Club and Others,
March 20, 2008, http://www.sierraclub.org/committees/cac/water/un-letter.pdf
|
|